So Many Accounting Method Choices. But Which Is the Right Choice?
As we teased in our article, Strategic Tax Planning Tips For Construction Industry Professionals, which appeared in the January edition of our Construction Industry Advisor newsletter , construction companies are unique in that they can choose from different accounting methods for income tax purposes. To better understand the accounting methods, let's dive into what the IRS considers a “long-term contract." Read Also: How To Prepare WIP Reports For Long-Term ContractsWhat Is Considered A Long-Term Contract (To The IRS)?
The IRS defines a long-term contract under Section 460 of the Internal Revenue Code as a contract that is:- Started and completed in two different fiscal years, and
- For the building, construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of, or the installation of any integral component to, or improvements of real property.
- Home Construction Contracts
- “Small” Contractors”
Home Construction Contracts
The Internal Revenue Code has outlined a broad set of rules when it comes to the definition of a home construction contract. For the requirements to be met, this type of contract must be able to attribute 80 percent of the estimated total contract costs to a dwelling unit that contains four or fewer dwelling units and improvements to real property directly related to the dwelling unit (etc., sidewalks, sewers, road, clubhouses, etc.). If you have a home construction contract, you should account for this contract under your overall method of accounting or the completed contract method (more information about both can be found below).
Additionally, a home construction contract does not have alternative minimum tax (AMT) preference items (more on that later), nor are the contracts subject to lookback provisions.
Small Contractor Exemption
The Internal Revenue Code states that a taxpayer is a small contractor if both of the following qualifications are met:
-
- At the time the contract is entered into, the contractor estimates the contract will be completed within two years, and
- The contractor’s annual tax gross receipts for the three taxable years preceding the taxable year in question are less than $31M (for 2025). This amount is annually adjusted for inflation.
Assuming a contractor meets these two tests, the overall accounting method or the completed contract method may be used to account for long-term contracts (otherwise known as the “exempt methods”)
Overall Accounting Method
The overall accounting method (cash and accrual methods) applies to any taxpayer, whether a contractor or not. Contractors would also default to the overall accounting method for any non-long term contract, such as construction management and repairs contracts - to name a few examples. The following is an overview of these two overall accounting methods:Cash Method
The cash method is the optimal method for a growing contractor. Under the cash method, income is recognized when it's actually or constructively received, and expenses are recognized when paid. This approach has numerous benefits, such as the deferral of income until cash is collected and the payment of taxes when the cash is available. Naturally, this method is pretty simple to understand. However, the cash method can lead to “bunching” of income as backlogs slow down, which can result in lumpy taxable income (i.e., high taxable income in Year 1 and low taxable income in Year 2 - even if the income you had in the books was similar over the two years). Furthermore, you will have to have a healthy backlog to continue to have a deferral of tax. This method can also lead to poor business practices, as a contractor may delay billing and speed up cash expenditures to minimize taxable income.
Accrual Method
Generally speaking, the accrual method is the least optimal tax method. When using this method, income is either recognized when it's received or earned (whichever is earlier), and expenses are deducted when the “all events” test has been met (which typically matches expenses with income recognition). For contractors, this is usually the worst method as overbillings are taxable. However, this method can have benefits, such as matching income and expenses and expensing under billings. However, tax planning may not correlate with business planning for an accrual method taxpayer. In short, this method should only be used in limited or unique circumstances.
Completed Contract Method
Finally, we will dig into the completed contract method, which means that any revenue and costs incurred as part of a contract are not recognized until the contract is “completed and accepted," which means the contract must be 95 percent complete, and the property must be occupied for its intended purposes. This method typically results in the greatest deferral of income - with the caveat that the contract in question must be accounted for under the Percent Complete method for AMT, a separate tax base that imposes a tax rate of 26 to 28 percent. With the current income tax rate being 29.6 percent for most taxpayers, the deferral only has an effective savings of 1.6 percent. The Completed Contract Method has many advantages, including:- It's easy to understand
- It allows you to maximize the deferral of income
- It can improve cash flow thanks to your ability to deploy aggressive billing practices with no impact on taxable income.